Dec. 16-The past week saw the first widespread exposure of the corrupt use of federal agencies, particularly the FBI, in the "palace coup" aspects of the ongoing attempt to topple President Trump. As sordid as the actions of a James Comey-led cabal of FBI agents have been revealed to be, if those involved in insurrection are to be fully exposed and prosecuted, Congress must dig deeper. If the American people are to rally to the President's side, they need a better understanding of the motives for the attempted coup against Trump. They also must see fundamental economic progress, which, if it happens, will finally deal the ongoing coup attempt a fatal blow. That is why LaRouche PAC has set a deadline of the President's State of the Union address on Jan. 30, 2018, to end this coup attempt, to secure U.S. participation in China's great One Belt One Road project, and to see Lyndon LaRouche's Four Laws for the economic recovery of the United States introduced as a national legislative program. In this article, we expand and update materials first set out in the EIR Special Report, "Robert Mueller is an Amoral Legal Assassin; He Will Do His Job If You Let Him." Here we provide further evidence of the British origins of the coup, by highlighting the central role in the coup against Trump being played by the AngloAmerican intelligence network. The same network also saw prominent "action" in the British-led, Obama-implemented, 2013-2014 coup d'état in Ukraine. This is not an accident. We also detail the desperate and crazed intervention of former President Barack Obama's intelligence chiefs in a bogus lawsuit presently pending in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., against the Trump Campaign and Roger Stone. This intervention, aimed at intimidating a sitting U.S. District Court Judge, was and is designed to resurrect the Russiagate narrative which has been uniformly rejected by the American public. Keeping this insane narrative going is central to continuing Robert Mueller's Special Counsel investigation, which rests on highly dubious legal foundations.