The ICBM organization and culture eroded during the transition from SAC through AFSPC, and immediate efforts are needed to address issues in the areas of mission, pride, expertise, and personnel management. First, SAC had a clear focus on the importance and critical nature of the nuclear mission; AFSPC lost focus on the nuclear mission due to other priorities. This can be corrected with improved AF understanding, communication and advocacy regarding the nuclear mission. Second, all indications suggest that SAC had a sense of pride and professionalism in its nuclear mission and AFSPC allowed that to erode. Actions must be taken to reinstall increased pride and professionalism into the nuclear community. Third, expertise is developed with proper training, education, evaluations, and by carefully nurturing this knowledge. SAC used constant training, evaluations, and competitions to validate that its personnel were prepared to execute the nuclear mission. During the AFSPC period, the expertise was allowed to wither and the AF must now redevelop this expertise. Finally, SAC maintained complete control on personnel management with its focus always being the nuclear mission. Personnel management for the nuclear career path was not well developed or encouraged under AFSPC. Provided recommendations are focused on the organizational and cultural changes that are needed in the areas of mission, pride, expertise, and personnel management.
This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.
This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.
As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.